MUI Koreks Wacana Alat Bantu Sex di Lapas, Saranye Menuju Nikah dan Puasa

BARU SAJA —，拒绝 bringing the issue of sex toys into the story of life behind bars, the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) confirmed the policy is unlawful for Muslim inmates. In a statement circulated, the organization described the item as haram and firmly advised that the policy should not be accommodated.

The rejection, reported minutes ago, came after a number of agencies and observers began circulating a discourse on the procurement and distribution of such tools for prisoners. According to information confirmed by the editorial team, the discourse did not come with clear academic foundations.

MUI firmly asserted that distributing sex toys to residents of correctional institutions (lapas) contradicts religious principles. The institution considers the practice a form of permissiveness that should not occur in a country with a Muslim majority.

Alasan yang Disampaikan

Instead of distributing the tool, the MUI pointed to two alternatives that are considered more appropriate according to the sharia dimension. First, residents who are married are advised to strengthen household communication with their spouse. Second, those who are single are advised to run the fast as a means of controlling biological desires.

• Marriage: residents are advised to maintain the household bond with a legal spouse.
• Fasting: the recommended approach to suppress biological urges for residents who are not married.
• Prohibition: distribution of sex toys in correctional institutions is declared unlawful.
• Reason: the policy is considered as introducing permissiveness and contradicting religious values.

Breaking news, the MUI also emphasized that the prison system should not treat the biological aspect of inmates as an engineering problem solved with objects. The institution considers the discourse as contrary to the principles of Islamic law that must be applied in the management of prisons.

Latar Belakang Wacana

The discourse on sex tools for prisoners emerged after a number of groups raised concerns about the high vulnerability of residents to various forms of exploitation. On the other hand, a scheme to regulate the distribution of such tools began to circulate among several stakeholders.

Saksi-saksi mata from the correctional environment confirmed that the discourse was initially triggered by a study on the mental health and sexual behavior of inmates. The study highlighted that a substantial portion of residents had a background of vulnerability and was in dire need of protection from sexual violence.

However, the MUI assessment concluded that such an approach was misguided. According to the organization, the solution must come from strengthening supervision, education, and worship, not from providing tools considered unlawful.

Tanggapan yang Menunggu

Up to the publication of this report, the response from the prison authority and the relevant ministry had not yet been confirmed in writing. Observers note that the final decision regarding this discourse will be determined through a cross-institutional coordination meeting.

The issue is expected to continue to be a polemic. A number of groups that had supported the discourse stated that they would await clarification before taking a definitive stance. They consider that the presence or absence of the policy must still be based on a comprehensive risk analysis.

Catatan Penutup

MUI reminds that the welfare of prisoners is a moral responsibility, yet it must be pursued through approaches consistent with religious values. The organization insists that marriage and fasting are considered the most proper means for residents to manage themselves while undergoing the sentence period.

This affirmation reinforces that the opposition from the MUI is categorical and does not leave room for partial policy. Any scheme involving sex tools for inmates is predicted to be stopped at the stage of discourse.